Court Clarifies “Major Cause” in Workers Comp in Massachusetts

In Goodwin’s Case, the Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed the Department of Industrial Accidents Reviewing Board decision affirming the Hearing Judge’s interpretation and application of G.L. c. 152, s. 1(7A).  That section of the Massachusetts workers compensation statute deals with cases where an employee has a pre-existing, non-work related medical condition that combines with a work injury resulting in disability from work and need for medical treatment.  When an employee has a pre-existing non-work related medical condition and, later, is injured at work, the employee has a heightened burden of causation and must prove through a supporting medical opinion that the work injury combined with the pre-existing non-work related medical condition and that the work injury is “a major cause, but not necessarily predominant cause” of the work disability and need for medical treatment.

Therein lies the legal tug of war between insurance attorneys and workers’ compensation attorneys in Boston or Massachusetts.  What did the Massachusetts Legislature mean by the term “a major” cause.  It is certainly not themajor cause; it is a major cause.  However, where do you strike the balance in determining when the employee has met his or her burden in order to be entitled to receive workers comp benefits?

In Goodwin’s Case, the impartial physician assigned to evaluate the employee on behalf of the DIA opined that the work injury was responsible for 40% of the employee’s disability and that a pre-existing degenerative condition was responsible for 60%.  The self-insurer argued that 40% could not be “a major cause”, and, therefore, the employee should lose.  The Massachusetts Appeals Court held that the DIA Hearing Judge correctly interpreted and applied G.L. c. 152, s. 1(7A).  The Appeals Court explained that the self-insurer’s argument is inconsistent with the legislative intent and would increase the employee’s burden of proof beyond the statute.

The above case illustrates a very common fact pattern that workers comp attorneys face on a daily basis representing injured workers.  For example, a middle aged construction worker may injure his back lifting something heavy on the job.  He may have had minor back injuries over the years working construction, but he always returned to work.  However, the lifting injury is bad, and the employee in all likelihood will not be able to return to heavy construction work.  At some point, the insurance company sends the employee for an insurance medical examination (IME).  The IME report says that the employee has arthritis and degenerative disc disease in the lumbar spine.  The IME report concludes that the employee may have suffered a lumbar sprain/strain which has since resolved and that the ongoing problems and disability are not related to any work injury.  Then, the insurance company terminates the employee’s workers compensation benefits and refuses to approve any future medical treatment.

The above fact pattern is typical and is the basis for the legal defenses addressed in Goodwin’s Case.  Without an experienced workers comp lawyer, that injured employee may not be able to secure further benefits under the Massachusetts workers compensation law.

If you have any questions concerning Massachusetts workers’ compensation benefits, even if you’re receiving benefits, you should contact Attorney John Sheehan to discuss your case.

Real Stories From
Our Clients

Attorney Sheehan has been serving the needs of Boston-area residents since 1993. Our mission is to ensure complete client satisfaction and to obtain the maximum possible settlement or verdict for our clients.

Historias Reales de Nuestros Clientes

El abogado Sheehan ha atendido las necesidades de los residentes del área de Boston desde el 1993. Nuestra misión es garantizar la satisfacción de nuestros clientes y obtener el mejor acuerdo posible en sus casos.

"John Sheehan is a highly knoweldgable and all around amazing lawyer!" Si volvemos a necesitar un abogado para algo en el futuro, USTED será a quien llamemos.

I was injured at work in 2019 and John and his team made the process as simple as anyone could!! They took care of everything! The only thing I had to do is rest and go to doctor appointments! I would HIGHLY recommend anyone looking for an attorney to hire John Sheehan - if you would like a nice and easy process in a highly stressful situation and on top of it attorney Sheehan will get you the maximum of what your case is worth!

John Sheehan y su personal son muy amables, corteses, rápidos y explican todo a fondo. Hicieron un trabajo maravilloso para mi esposo y para mí y no podría recomendar un abogado más calificado. Hizo TODO lo que pudo por mi esposo y por mí a través de la compensación de trabajadores. He recomendado y continuaré recomendando a John a cualquiera de mis amistades que necesiten sus destrezas. Trabajo asombroso. John, Muchas gracias tanto de Al como de mí. No puedo agradecerte lo suficiente por hacer todo lo posible por nosotros. Cada vez que teníamos una pregunta, devolvía nuestras llamadas rápidamente. Esperamos no haberte vuelto loco. Si alguna vez necesitamos un abogado para algo, USTED será a quien llamemos. Muchas gracias de nuevo. ¡Gran trabajo! John, me gustaría darte las gracias aunque Judy ya lo hizo. Usted es el major y el personal de su oficina responden llamadas en seguida. Definitivamente lo recomendaremos a nuestros amigos si necesitan sus servicios. ¡Gracias nuevamente por un trabajo bien hecho!

- Jon P. (Google) Judy y Al Crowe
boston workers compensation lawyer 5.0/5.0
Boston Workers Comp Lawyer
Best Boston Car Accident Lawyers
Best Boston personal injury lawyer
boston car accident attorney
Best boston car accident attorney